Post by Henry Emeka (@Emekus)
Nigeria used Mota‑Engil (a Portuguese company) because no Nigerian construction firm had the technical capacity, financing strength, or international rail‑building track record required for a project of this scale.
Why Nigeria Didn’t Use a Nigerian-Owned Company
Here are the four real reasons the government awarded the Kano–Maradi railway to Mota‑Engil.
Financing: Mota‑Engil brought its own money
This is the biggest reason.
The Kano–Maradi railway is a $1.9 billion project.
Mota‑Engil agreed to:
Provide part of the financing
Work under an EPC + financing model (Engineering, Procurement, Construction + partial funding)
No Nigerian company could offer that level of financing.
In major infrastructure deals, the contractor who brings money usually wins.
Technical capacity: Nigerian firms don’t yet build standard-gauge railways
Nigeria has strong construction companies (Julius Berger Nigeria, Dantata & Sawoe, CCECC Nigeria Ltd, etc.), but:
None have built a complete standard-gauge railway end‑to‑end
None have the specialized rail engineering equipment
None have the international certification required for cross‑border rail
Railway construction is extremely specialized — far more complex than roads or bridges.
Speed and experience: Mota‑Engil has built railways across Africa
Mota‑Engil has delivered rail projects in:
Angola
Mozambique
Malawi
Uganda
They have:
Heavy rail machinery
Experienced rail engineers
A proven delivery record
Nigeria needed a company that could start immediately.
Diplomatic and geopolitical reasons
The Kano–Maradi line connects Nigeria to Niger Republic.
The project was partly driven by:
ECOWAS integration
Cross‑border trade
Regional influence
Portugal (Mota‑Engil’s home country) has strong ties in West Africa.
Awarding the contract to Mota‑Engil helped secure:
International support
Financing guarantees
Diplomatic cooperation
But here’s the part many people don’t know
Even though Mota‑Engil is foreign, Nigerians still do most of the actual work.
Large foreign contractors typically:
Bring foreign engineers
Hire local labor
Subcontract to local Nigerian companies
On similar projects (Lagos–Ibadan, Abuja–Kaduna), over 80% of workers were Nigerians.
The exact number for Kano–Maradi has not been published, but the pattern is consistent.
Bottom line Nigeria didn’t use a Nigerian-owned company because:
Nigerian firms couldn’t finance the project
They lacked rail‑building experience
Mota‑Engil offered better technical capacity
The project required international guarantees
This is common worldwide — even the U.S. and U.K. hire foreign firms for major rail projects.
https://constructionreviewonline.com/tinubu-sets-2026-deadline-for-completion-of-kano-maradi-railway-project/?utm_source=copilot.com
https://dailytrust.com/kano-maradi-rail-project-now-at-60-completion-tinubu/?utm_source=copilot.com
0 likes · 0 comments · 0 shares