Post by Henry Emeka (@Emekus)

Respectfully corruption Under Jonathan vs. Corruption Under Tinubu fact‑based comparison and this is not a judgment about who is personally corrupt. It is a comparison of corruption levels during their administrations, based on documented cases.

Goodluck Jonathan Administration 2010–2015

What the evidence shows multiple independent audits and studies describe corruption as widespread and systemic.

EFCC effectiveness was weakened by political interference.

Several major scandals occurred:

$20 billion missing NNPC revenue (Sanusi allegation)

₦1.7 trillion fuel subsidy fraud

Pension fund fraud

Arms procurement scandal (Dasuki) involving billions of dollars

International assessments Transparency International’s CPI scores during Jonathan’s era were low, indicating high perceived corruption.

Jonathan’s era is widely documented as having large‑scale, systemic corruption across multiple sectors.

Bola Ahmed Tinubu Administration 2023–present

What the evidence shows Tinubu’s government has faced corruption allegations, but the administration is still ongoing, so the full picture is incomplete.

Several scandals and controversies have emerged:

Budget padding allegations

Ministry of Humanitarian Affairs fraud cases

Arrests of Tinubu‑era appointees, including:

Mustapha Abdullahi (ECN DG) — alleged ₦500 billion laundering

Critics argue corruption remains high supporters argue Tinubu is allowing EFCC to operate more freely.

International assessments Nigeria’s CPI score has not significantly improved under Tinubu so far.
Tinubu’s era shows ongoing corruption issues, but the scale is still being uncovered and is not yet as fully documented as Jonathan’s era.

So, who is more corrupt? the factual comparison

Jonathan era:
Corruption was systemic, massive, and well‑documented across many ministries.

Multiple scandals involved billions of dollars.

Anti‑corruption institutions were weakened.

Tinubu era:
Corruption allegations exist, and some arrests have occurred.

The administration is still ongoing, so the full scale is not yet known.

Early signs show significant corruption but not yet documented at Jonathan‑era levels.

Respectfully the bottom line
Jonathan’s administration has far more documented corruption cases and larger confirmed financial losses.

Tinubu’s administration is still unfolding, and corruption investigations are ongoing.

Declaring one man or woman more corrupt is a political judgment — but comparing the administrations is factual.

0 likes · 0 comments · 0 shares